Update | Three Killed in Car Accident on Santa Fe Drive in Merced County

Home » Update | Three Killed in Car Accident on Santa Fe Drive in Merced County
August 10, 2022
Edward Smith

Three Killed in Crash on Santa Fe Drive

A crash on Santa Fe Drive killed three parties on the morning of Sunday, August 7, 2022. The incident took place shortly before 6:00 a.m. on Santa Fe Drive just west of Franklin Road in Merced County, the California Highway Patrol reported.

Details on the Crash on Santa Fe Drive That Killed Three People

The crash involved two vehicles described as a 2017 Nissan Rogue and a Jeep Patriot, according to CHP traffic officers. A preliminary investigation revealed that one of the cars was believed to have been headed westbound on Santa Fe Drive while the other was traveling eastbound. One of the vehicles allegedly entered the oncoming traffic lane, and the accident occurred.

The crash caused major damage to both vehicles, officials reported. Emergency personnel was requested at the scene of the accident to provide assistance. Sadly, three parties were declared deceased at the collision site.

Officials have recently identified the decedents as 38-year-old Amandeep Toor from Atwater, 33-year-old Jenny Faulkner from Merced, and 33-year-old David Faulkner from Merced. The cause of the incident remains under investigation, and the names of the decedents have been withheld due to pending family notification.

How Can a Wrongful Death Case Help Our Family?

A wrongful death claim is intended to make a family whole again after the loss of a loved one. Survivors may receive compensation for financial and intangible losses, such as mental anguish, lost companionship, loss of financial support, funeral and burial costs, medical treatment costs associated with the final injury, and more. While no amount of money can make things right again for a family after the tragic and sudden loss of a loved one, it may help provide them with the means for a more secure future. Aside from this, it may also provide a sense of justice and closure for the loss of a close relative, knowing that the at-fault individual or entity have been held liable for damages incurred.

There are many steps in the wrongful death claims process that must be met. Remember that California law restricts the amount of time a family must file a wrongful death matter in civil court. A two-year statute of limitations generally applies, meaning that survivors must file a lawsuit in court if a mutual settlement agreement is not reached within that time limit. Insurance carriers may be difficult to work with, so working with an experienced attorney is crucial to the outcome of a claim. Retaining legal counsel to start the process is essential to gathering and preserving evidence before it is lost or destroyed.

At AutoAccident.com, our Merced wrongful death attorneys understand that dealing with the aftermath of a loved one’s passing may be challenging and all-consuming. However, waiting too long may result in the loss of the opportunity to seek justice and financial compensation. Know that when your family turns to our legal team for assistance, our injury lawyers will handle every step of the claims process for you all. This way, you and your family can focus on grieving and recovering from your loss. Learn more about us and how we can help you with your case by watching the video below.

Wrongful Death Lawyer in Merced

I’m Ed Smith, a Merced wrongful death lawyer. The loss of a close relative is always a devastating and heartbreaking event. Surviving family members may be left wanting justice and closure. This may be accomplished by bringing a wrongful death claim with the assistance of an experienced accident attorney. You can get in touch with us today for compassionate, free, and friendly advice on your case from one of our skilled Merced accident lawyers by dialing (209) 227-1931 or (800) 404-5400.

Visit these links to learn more about our law firm:

We are proud to be members of these groups:

Photograph Attribution: Pexels – “KatSmith

:ds llo [cs 671]