Autonomous Vehicles

Autonomous Vehicles

Sacramento Autonomous Vehicle Injury Attorney

Autonomous Vehicles: Liability and Regulation

I’m Ed Smith, an Sacramento Autonomous Vehicle Injury Attorney. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), around 2.2 million people are injured in car crashes every year. Studies revealed that most of those collisions were caused by driver error, such as inattention or distraction. The increasing rate of traffic accidents in the U.S. has led some to suggest that autonomous vehicles (AVs) could go a long way towards decreasing accidents. While AVs may reduce the number of car crashes in the nation, there are still a host of concerns related to liability and regulation that could affect those injured in collisions, so if you were injured in an accident that involved an AV, it is vital to speak to an experienced personal injury attorney who can help explain your legal options.

 

Autonomous Vehicle (AV) Technology Classifications

The NHTSA classifies AV technology into five levels, including:

  • No automation, where the driver is in complete control of the vehicle;
  • Function-specific automation, which means that at least one specific control function is operated automatically;
  • Combined function automation, which includes automation of at least two primary control functions;
  • Limited self-driving automation, where drivers cede full control of all safety-critical functions, although occasional control is still available; and
  • Full self-driving automation, in which the vehicle, whether occupied or unoccupied, performs all safety-critical driving functions and monitors roadway conditions.

Liability – So Who Is Really at Fault When an AV Crashes?

Despite the prediction that AVs could lead to a 90 percent reduction in crashes, critics still raise questions about how liability will affect car accident victims. Some states, such as California and Nevada, have determined that in such cases the AV operator is liable for any injury or damage that occurs.They have further defined operator as the person who is either:

  • The person behind the controls and available for manual use; or
  • The individual who causes the technology to engage.

Other State Mandates

Nevada and Florida lawmakers have also clarified that vehicle manufacturers are immune from liability for any aftermarket adaptations that convert a standard vehicle into an AV. Other states mandate that AV manufacturers carry at least $5 million in liability insurance. Recently, RAND Corporation published an article predicting that as AV use increases, liability will shift from drivers to manufacturers. However, this in turn has raised concerns that AV developers will have no incentive to promote the best design or invest in testing protocols. To avoid this, some have argued for implicit or explicit preemption, which would immunize developers and manufacturers from being sued as long as they adhere to minimum federal standards.

Remote Control & Hacking Concerns 

Another worrying issue is the possibility that AVs could be hacked through remote control of the vehicles’ control systems and central command. A new law, the Security and Privacy in Your Car Act of 2015, would require NHTSA to develop standards to prevent hacking, although if passed, the law would not require the issuance of final regulations for another three years.

Related Articles by Ed Smith:

Sacramento Autonomous Vehicle Injury Attorney

I’m Ed Smith, a Sacramento Autonomous Vehicle Injury Attorney. If you or a family member has been seriously injured or has passed away in an accident involving an autonomous vehicle, please call me at (916) 921-6400 for free, friendly advice. If you are calling from outside the Sacramento region, please call me on my toll-free line at (800) 404-5400 for free, friendly advice.

Read my some of my customer and peer reviews on: Yelp, Avvo, and Google Plus.

Look up some of my Past Verdicts and Settlements.

Did you know that I am a Million Dollar Advocate? Million Dollar Advocates are trial lawyers who have won multiple million dollar case settlements and verdicts on behalf of their injured clients.

Source of Autonomous Vehicles – autoaccident.com

Photo Attribution: Steve Jurvetson [CC BY 2.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0)], via Wikimedia Commons

:sb/bw

Posted In:
Updated:

Client Reviews

  • Me and my wife; had a car accident. We were amazed how easy, professional, friendly attorney Ed Smith is along with his staff. Everybody is amazing. Thank you so much, we are very impressed!
    Sincerely,
    ★★★★★
  • Ed Smith and his office team took on a difficult personal injury case on my behalf and for the passenger in my car. Ed is a top- notch attorney. His staff couldn't have been more helpful and kind. No need to look elsewhere. I give Ed Smith my highest recommendation.
    ★★★★★
  • Ed and Robert have been taking great care of my husband and I for the past 5+ years. They are always there when you have a problem and a quick resolution! Even when the issues have nothing to do with them. They are willing to help ease the pain off your shoulders. They are as good as it gets! Thank you again for everything.
    ★★★★★
  • Very professional. Great team, staff and service all around. Mr Smith was very honest, straight forward with his advice. He gives the word "attorney" an honest reputation. I will seek his council anytime, and would recommend him at the drop of a dime.
    ★★★★★
  • I would highly recommend Ed Smith to any friends or family in need of a personal injury attorney. Ed, and his staff, are very caring on top of being very experienced in this field. The staff always keeps you informed of the status of your case and they are always easy to reach by phone.
    ★★★★★
  • Edward Smith law offices provide competent, thorough, and personable help for victims of personal injury. When you first meet the staff you know you contacted the right office. This law office treats clients like people. I recommend this office to anyone seeking representation regarding personal injury.
    ★★★★★